Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND

06-17-2010 , 02:29 AM
I see a pattern too. You say the bible has the answer to everything, but because we are not true believers , we cant see it. So then we ask you to explain it to us (like where do asians come from), but you cant, so then you say we are attacking you and ignore us.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 02:32 AM
thay wer INCEST!!!
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 02:34 AM
There are some things better off unsaid. Huge lesson i am still learning.

You can't say Pletho wasn't attacked. Did you read the last page or so? Or are you just selfishly looking for answers?
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 02:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcmoussa
I see a pattern too. You say the bible has the answer to everything, but because we are not true believers , we cant see it. So then we ask you to explain it to us (like where do asians come from), but you cant, so then you say we are attacking you and ignore us.
Look at the chart, it shows you where asians came from.

If you need help, use google and type in some of the names in the chart, you will find out what these nations are and the races that came from them.

I am not wasting my time to convince a goat that he is a sheep.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 02:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcmoussa
Im lebanese, which one of these men was my greatx113-grandfather?
الله يحبك كثيرا جدا
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 03:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pletho
Below is an image that gives the basic geneology of all mankind all the way back to NOAH and his 3 sons (and their wives ).

Why? Because the flood wiped out all other people.

This does not take into consideration the findings of ancient skelatal remains of men whom are classified as genetically not related to us, and others of the such who are thought to have existed longer than 6,000 years ago.

From Adam and Eve on until now is what is called the second heaven and earth, the skelatal remains of those that have supposedly been proven to be older than appx. 6,000 years are from the "first heaven and earth" time period that was destroyed.

The earth was then re-plenished by Adam and Eve, then purged then re-populated by the generations of Noah.

TABLE OF NATIONS
lols
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 03:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryanb9
lols
Dont laugh too hard you might blow a fuse.

Your not included in this chart you came from one of two places.

1. Monkeys
2. Donkeys (a.k.a. jackass) J.K.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 09:20 AM
How exactly did they evolve from middle easterners to asians though?
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 10:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunth0807
You have only had an account since Jan...
i was a long time lurker, genius
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcmoussa
How exactly did they evolve from middle easterners to asians though?
Through the power of Jesus Christ.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pletho
I have seen an interesting pattern while here at RGT.

First they attack and then when that does not work they try something else, like riducule and then they try and throw something else into the mix.

Its funny to me because I know whats really going on behind the scenes, meaning I know what the whole reason and motivation behind these types of posts are.

Its like millitary tactics, diversion, deciet, manipulation, discrediting, and any other thing that the advesary can come up with to stop the truth of Gods word from being read or believed.


maybe you should answer my question of why you think all of modern science is lying about evidence that refutes everything you say.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neue Regel
maybe you should answer my question of why you think all of modern science is lying about evidence that refutes everything you say.
not all
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 10:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilSteve


yes all.

YECs represent less than .1% of those with credentials in related fields, are invariably hawking papers, websites, and/or books to the uniformed christian populous rather than trying to convince their peers, and their views on the subject of the flood/human anthropology and geology are not taken seriously by anyone actually working in related fields.

if there was a global flood and all of life had a hard restart within the last 6000 years the evidence for it would be OBVIOUS and everwhere. science would be compelled to take the idea seriously. it would not be espoused only by a tiny percentage of outliers with demonstratable non-scientific agendas and considered crackpot by everyone else.

even many christians are being compelled to alter their views and treat the first few chapters of genesis as allegory (around 50% in recent US polls). it's now the official position of the catholic church. there is a reason for that. science has proven beyond any reasonable doubt that there was no flood and life did not die out 6000 years ago.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 11:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pletho
I have seen an interesting pattern while here at RGT.

First they attack and then when that does not work they try something else, like riducule and then they try and throw something else into the mix.

Its funny to me because I know whats really going on behind the scenes, meaning I know what the whole reason and motivation behind these types of posts are.

Its like millitary tactics, diversion, deciet, manipulation, discrediting, and any other thing that the advesary can come up with to stop the truth of Gods word from being read or believed.
I see how you rightly divide.

There's really nothing going on behind the scenes. Since day one people have gone through these very open stages.

(1) First Contact: Questioning phase. Someone converses with you. Challenges your nonsense. Takes in your replies and questions: "Wow, this guy is a hoot. This guy's mocking Christians, right? no one's this batsh*t!" "Is this a troll?" "This is a joke, right?"
(2) Acceptance: This may take days or even months. This is never complete. (in other words, there's always some lingering doubt that you, in fact, are an elaborate joke... but its no longer in the front.) At this point, some people challenge your posts seriously. This, inevitably leads to (3)
(3) mockery. One people realize that you can't argue with someone who is irrational and prone to cirular reasoning and, more importantly, isn't interested in discussion or believes he's wrong about anything... there's nothing left to do but laugh.
(4) some get to Dismiss/ignore. Or go between 3 or 4.

Please... there's no secret that you see. Nothing going on behind the scenes. Everyone's upfront about it. Everything thinks you're a kook. And they really care to challenge most of what you say because its like arguing with a brick wall.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 11:20 AM
Quote:
it's now the official position of the catholic church.
Quote:
even many christians are being compelled to alter their views and treat the first few chapters of genesis as allegory (around 50% in recent US polls).
Cause and affect.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunth0807
Cause and affect.
The cause and effect you mention are the hold-outs catching up to what the rest of the world has accepted since the 19th Century.

Quote:
From the mid-seventeenth (c. 1650 AD) to the mid-eighteenth century (c. 1750 AD), a range of British mathematicians, naturalists, and clerics from the Church of England attempted to demonstrate that belief in a global biblical deluge was perfectly compatible with extrabiblical knowledge and the latest theoretical developments in mechanistic science. They maintained that the fact that such a deluge had occurred could now be established not only on the basis of biblical authority but also on mathematical and scientific grounds. Their various theories reflected different conceptions of natural theology, the roles of science and theology, and the bearing of Scripture on the interpretation of nature. Their diluvial cosmogonies provided a mainstream scientific paradigm that stimulated hard thought, biblical exegesis, widespread geological observation, and some of the earliest geological experiments.

.......

In the end, the old diluvial cosmogonies fell victim to their own success. The genuine spirit of scientific inquiry that they engendered and stimulated gradually produced a wealth of geological discoveries that undercut the premises of diluvialism. All manner of different field observations indicated that geological strata could not be the remains of layers of soft sediments deposited together at the same time. Furthermore, the plethora of exegeses of the deluge account raised doubts in many scholarly minds about whether the Bible was being properly used in trying to settle questions of geological history. By the middle of the eighteenth century, few competent proponents of diluvialism remained.

The basic pattern of the attempts to accommodate extrabiblical information during this period is by now familiar. Scholars began with the assumption that the biblical flood narrative describes a literal universal deluge and then sought evidence of that event using the best scientific tools and evidence available to them. As evidence accumulated, however, their theories became increasingly untenable, and when that happened, all those who were dedicated to the truth of the matter -- scientists and theologians alike -- abandoned the discredited hypotheses and began to look elsewhere.
from HERE

There's always some knuckledraggers though taking 200 years to catch up.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 11:56 AM
That is your opinion.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 12:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunth0807
That is your opinion.
Umm... no, it wasn't my opinion. It was the opinion of the majority of Biblical Scholars and scientists for centuries.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 12:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcmoussa
How exactly did they evolve from middle easterners to asians though?
Each one of his sons, had children and they had children and so on, that migrated to different areas of the world. The tower of babel happened around the time of Nimrod and then the whole world which had one language was divided into many languages and after that they all migrated to different areas, as for the facial features and skin colors that was all in the different genetic packages.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 12:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kurto
Umm... no, it wasn't my opinion. It was the opinion of the majority of Biblical Scholars and scientists for centuries.
You do realize that all the evidence they use, does not prove anything.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splendour
More on the Tower of Babel - Day of Pentecost comparison:

http://www.trinitycrc.org/sermons/ac02v04.html
Ugh. I actually read that whole thing and laughed. It was entertaining. But you take it seriously?
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pletho
I have seen an interesting pattern while here at RGT.

First they attack and then when that does not work they try something else, like riducule and then they try and throw something else into the mix.

Its funny to me because I know whats really going on behind the scenes, meaning I know what the whole reason and motivation behind these types of posts are.

Its like millitary tactics, diversion, deciet, manipulation, discrediting, and any other thing that the advesary can come up with to stop the truth of Gods word from being read or believed.
Its not RGT thats the problem. If you posted on +90% of the Christian forums out there you would have your ideas questioned. Of course the adversary is everywhere so that probably explains it.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 12:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neue Regel
maybe you should answer my question of why you think all of modern science is lying about evidence that refutes everything you say.
Simple, they do not think they are lying, they think they are right.

They have a theory that has not been close to proven and since almost all modern scientist are athiest, they do not want to ascribe anything to God or the bible.

You think I do not have a firm grasp on how things work and thats ok with me, because I know the spritual realm and how it works which you do not. Plus I have the added knowledge of the physical realm, so that gives me just a tad bit more insight into whats going on.

I do not want to debate with you or anyone else, I am just posting what I know and believe to be true, which comes from the bible. In no way am I obligated to prove it, if you want to know more you need to study more of the bible. Because I am not supposed to prove things to you nor anyone else, I am to speak it and if you believe great and if you do not, oh well.

In circumstances where people want to know more (genuinely) meaning they really are wanting to know more, to learn so they can know God and his word, then I will go into much greater detail and explanation, but in your case I think its more of you believe I am wrong and you are right, so you are trying to debate me ect........ So, I am inclined to think its not best to mess with someone who is trapping and debating with no serious intentions and evil motivations.

If I am wrong, I apologize.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote
06-17-2010 , 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
Its not RGT thats the problem. If you posted on +90% of the Christian forums out there you would have your ideas questioned. Of course the adversary is everywhere so that probably explains it.
I agree, as a matter of fact I would be attacked more on a Christian forum, because 90% of them are trinitarians that beleive that Jesus is God.
FAMILY TREE OF ALL MANKIND Quote

      
m