Below is an image that gives the basic geneology of all mankind all the way back to NOAH and his 3 sons (and their wives ).

Why? Because the flood wiped out all other people.

This does not take into consideration the findings of ancient skelatal remains of men whom are classified as genetically not related to us, and others of the such who are thought to have existed longer than 6,000 years ago.

From Adam and Eve on until now is what is called the second heaven and earth, the skelatal remains of those that have supposedly been proven to be older than appx. 6,000 years are from the "first heaven and earth" time period that was destroyed.

The earth was then re-plenished by Adam and Eve, then purged then re-populated by the generations of Noah.

no

A part of the myth I'm unclear of... Noah had 3 songs. All other people wiped out. Who did they mate with?

It is questions like these that make it crystal clear that some atheists don't put much effort at all in understanding God's Word, even though they claim they do.

they brought their wives with them.

well, all of the instruments were destroyed so he had to build new ones after the flood. The he started making new songs.

mmmmmmm ham

Tree is strangely lacking in monkeys, I don't buy it.

LOL. From the guy who never forgot anything in highschool then couldn't remember a single history textbook.

If I spent 18-20 years making an effort, concluded it was a crock... at what point am I allowed to forget details?

Your deductive powers really suck.

nice!

Nice observation "EvilSteve".

No monkeys in human family tree.............

But some people feel comforted believing they are related to monkeys, so lets not hurt their feelings too much.

I think its more logical that we could have came from Donkeys, especially considering that so many people act like jackasses on this forum

Stoop lower and lower kurto. GL with that. Didn't you already address this in another thread? I'm sorry learning the names of the text books weren't part of the curriculum.

You must of forgot that minor detail to drop the hate also.

Nice..........................

no doubt in the same way egyptian culture immediately before the flood is classified as not related to egyptian culture immediately after.

Making sense as always melchy.

The idea that Pletho is actually a super angry atheist who is mocking religion makes perfect sense now.

Please explain what you mean?

Is that a relative of yours? J.K.

It never ceases to amaze me that when someone is confronted with truth and can't figure a way out to really intelligently dispute it, they rationalize in whatever ways they can to discount my credibility.

At least I know your confused.

Just be happy he didn't change your posts around then quote them like that was what you posted.

Not clear how I'm stooping lower. There's nothing in my post that isn't completely honest and accurate. As usual, I see you can't address any of my points.

Re: textbooks, you don't have to be told to memorize the name of the textbook you open every day. You just don't have the integrity to admit your memory isn't what you claimed.

I'm not sure that last sentence you posted makes sense. But, we do know you're continuing to demonstrate that you lied when you promised you would ignore me.

Try to respond to my points. I'll spell it out since you're slow and can't follow a thread:

You said:
Of course it does no such thing unless the proof that understanding God's word means that one has to study it their entire lives and remember every detail.

In my response:
Meaning, I was raised a Christian and remained so until around when i graduated college. In that time I regularly attended church, Bible studies, youth classes, confirmation, etc. Once I became an atheist, I stopped studying since it no longer had any value to me. You following.

Nearly 20 years go by and I don't recall all the details of Noah's story.

I ask a question and then the board troll responds, "...some atheists don't put much effort at all in understanding God's Word, even though they claim they do"

You can see why I conclude that you your reasoning sucks since your conclusion is wrong and you lack the information required to make such a determination.

Now in my response to you (again), I point out the problem with your post, namely
Do you respond to the fact that I spent nearly 2 decades making an effort? Do you think about the idea that someone forgetting a detail (in this case after 20 years) isn't really indicative of what you say? No. Gunth ignores it and does his usual derail.

You need to start your own thread please.............you can argue with Gunth on it all you want...........

you are correct. My question was answered by Melchy and that should have been the end of it.

Sad that it took an atheist to answer your question.