Evidence against TFSM: I'm a Celiac and so is 1% of the population. Why would his noodly greatness make 1% of the world have an autoimmune disease towards his awesomeness?

You wouldn't be a Celiac if you had more faith.

It's all part of the FSM's master plan and how very dare you question it!!!!

And obviously you don't realise that his noodly appendages could be gluten free you heathen.

Yes, you're right. I will from this point forward have more faith and hopefully the FSM will cure my celiacs. In fact, I BELIEVE 100% IN THE FSM AS OF THIS POINT FORWARD. I can feel the Celiacs leaving my body as we speak, OH THANK YOU LORD FSM!

In my personal connection with the FSM, since he is my personal FSM, I imagined him to be made out of rice flour and not wheat.

You didn't 'imagine it'. The FSM communicated with you.

You lucky bastard!

The FSM works in mysterious ways.

So does that make me a prophet????????? When they read about me 2000 years from now I'm gonna be famous!

You're not a prophet but you do have a personal relationship with him. Kinda like Ragu.

Splendour, you are the antithesis of "intuitive". If you didn't read it somewhere, or it disagrees with what you already believe, then it doesn't exist.

Nice try though, it sounds good.

You like hypotheticals now?

If you can't tell the difference between real life situations that people encounter and a hypothetical or fantasy one (the little word "if" doesn't necessarily make a statement hypothetical, y'know) then I suggest you don't argue or engage in religious debate any more and spend more time just pondering the Word of God and ask God for enlightenment on it before reading it.

It's easy to trick the mind with false comparisons y'know.

That's probably why so many people engage in cognitively distorted posts in this forum.

15 Common Cognitive Distortions
By John M. Grohol, Psy.D.
http://psychcentral.com/lib/2009/15-...e-distortions/

everyone once in a while she types something so perfectly written to do the opposite of what she's supposed to be doing that I give consideration to the long held (but usually discarded theory) that she's an elaborate satire.

I'm about 50/50 on that hypothesis, seriously.

I've often thought the exact same thing.