Quote:
Originally Posted by neeeel
What? Are you saying that no one will turn up at your door?
That's exactly the point. Government doesn't exist, but someone is going to show up at the door. You are stuck in a position where even if you claim the government doesn't exist, there are still things that happen.
So I really don't care if your ontological perspective doesn't allow you to directly acknowledge the existence of things like government or economics, you're still functionally operating as though they do exist.
Just like with everything so far, it's a definition game. I don't care whether you think this or that is or is not a hate crime. All I need to do is shift the language the talk about specific behaviors, and then the point is made.
All of the obfuscation by definition can be (and has been) replaced by specific behaviors, and you're either accepting the data or rejecting it. There's not really a discussion/debate.