Ignore the announcer, she has no idea where the action is or what is even going on....History plays a role in this hand and to why I played it in such fashion so I'll try to give a brief explanation on players involved.
Seat 1 is Chad...I view him as a competent "internet" type of player, and from our table talks throughout the night he most likely views me as thinking/competent as well, and being tight aggressive. We tangled earlier in the night where I fired 2 shells and he raised my turn bet with a straight draw and I folded.
Seat 2 is Chris who is super loose aggressive. We have played other sessions together and his vpip is 90% but is more than competent is not an idiot, definitely a smart player. He views me as tight aggressive, possibly borderline nitty.
Seat 9 is JT, an amateur poker player and is an actor, super cool guy but definitely an amateur. He plays super tight, have played 10+ sessions with him have never seen him without monsters when shown down plays very nitty/passive.
My image at this point is pretty solid, I've only shown down pretty solid hands. Game is about 3 hours into session, and session is pretty aggressive/thin bets being made etc.
Hero: Stack $1500
Chad: Covers all
Hero raises $25 8
Chad 3 bets to $80 from CO
Chris cold calls $80.
Hero 4 bets to $240....
I 4 bet because in my mind JT flatting my raise, then having to face a 3bet and then 4bet by me is a super strong line so I'm not concerned about him. Chris/Chad are smart enough to know I've been playing tight/aggressive and we are deep enough for me to barrel if need be...just wanted to see what unbiased opinions thought as far as if this is viewed (as described with game flow, players, this exact situation,etc.) as a spew....you can watch this video to see the hand play out...
2:42:18 hand begins..