Quote:
Originally Posted by Evoxgsr96
Can you elaborate a bit perhaps?
I'm afraid of Renton tearing me a new a**hole because writing this out it sounds silly, but it has just always made sense to me.
I believe it was David Benefield who said "I don't give a **** if I'm betting for value or a bluff, why can't it be both? I'm betting to win the hand"
This flop in particular is one that we really smash and he's fairly face up.
There's just no value in bluffcatching on this texture (one reason for checking), the times we do have the best hand (vs. AK for example), we are just free rolling his equity(as he's never bluffing), and the times he has QQ+ it's gonna be hard for him to call down, and even when he does call down it's thin as hell vs. our range.
I think good players might come in here and explain things I don't understand and put different hands in a bluffing range here but for me, turning tp into a bluff when it has little bluffcatching value itself...that just makes sense to me and is something I have done successfully.
So while I agree betting here is technically "overplaying" AJ specifically in terms of hand values and our range, I still think it's a fine line.
There are some good players that know to take c/c lines here with AA, but that doesn't mean you don't unload the clip when God gives you JT9hh flops.
A similar concept but slight derail is betting value hands in PLO, but preferring folds. This happens a lot in PLO and again it's the "win the hand with your range advantage" mentality.