Quote:
Originally Posted by SqredII
I just think that the reg has to have a hand here. We have two blockers two blockers to AK, and I really doubt he is trying to iso our iso of the whale. I think any decent reg is going to be very leary of a 5 bet that basically commits you to the hand, and will tread lightly if not insta fold the range I put him on.
Not agreeing or disagreeing with your post, but just want to point out btn "having to have a hand here" is more of a reason for a 5bet, not less of a reason.
I flat in spots similar to this a lot, we just don't have position so dumb things can happen on the flop with still a decent chunk not committed when it's pretty clear it could have been. If we were btn and btn was sb then flat has way more merit or if we were UTG and whale had 3bet then I'd definitly flat a btn 4bet but here we are in a dumb spot (yes I realize we'd have "relative position")
When a reg announces to the world "I have QQ+" and a whale announces to the world "lolz only $400?" I try and get more money in pre. Sometimes you have to take face up lines with the nuts. This is live poker.
As timebomb says if he's ever capable of folding QQ+ here a flat would have a stronger case.
I do think the bigger discussion would be 5bet sizing, a tank shove does look "bluffiest" but most live players play in terms of money not thought.
So I would ask OP if reg cares about money...would a tank shove look bluffier than $925 or is he sigh calling $400 everytime more but tank folding to a shove out of its sheer size.