Quote:
Originally Posted by The Muffin Man
What worse value hands do you guys expect villain to bet/call turn and call river with?
look he's probably not betting any XK hands or Kx hands (if he has any KX where X < King). He probably only bets the river w/ sets and while i dont place a lot of faith in the profile after only 1 hour of play, i do think you would have seen some PF activity from the guy within an hour that would suggest he is going to run some sick bluff w/ 79/56/64 etc.
In other words, i'm pretty sure he plays the river closer to something: bets all sets, hardly ever bets missed draws. Never bets Kx.
I do think that he will call bets w/ all AK combos a decent % of the time, and will probably never bluff raise (and maybe never even raise 88 here).
Min raising the turn also would most likely turn his 88+ face up (& if he did this one time happen to cold call w/ KK here, but i hardly even want to give him 1 single full combo of KK in my estimates)
At this point its a algebra equation: when he fires river we lose vs the % of time we bet and he calls and we win and we bet and he calls and we lose.
Im pretty sure the latter has a higher expected value, especially if we min raise the turn making 1/2 pot in min raise scenario bigger than 1/2 pot w/o.
I'm having trouble following what info we do have with general expectation of that info - help me out some:
So what you're saying is whenever he bet/calls turn he has 88+?
But in some other hypothetical where we just call turn bet he will sometimes bluff w/ 56/79/64? From a guy who limp calls 25% of the time?
Something just doesnt add up in my head on that part of it - is there some other part of the argument you can elucidate further to solidify the above?