Quote:
Originally Posted by Nice_Guy_Eddie
I recently went to Vegas for CES. I hit the 1-3/1-2 tables because I didn't want to bring a huge roll. About half the players at the table claimed they moved to Vegas to be a 'poker pro.' They were laughably nittish and straight forward. They simply cannot sustain a lifestyle based on their play. Literally none of them were winning players long term.
Why would you need to bring a 'huge roll' to move just one step up to $2-5?
If your assessments of the other players' profitability is any indicator of your own skills level, you must have cleaned up in those bottom limit CES games, and it's hard to understand why just a couple of grand shouldn't be plenty to keep you out of the 'sandbox' for a few days?