Quote:
Originally Posted by MadTiger
Typical 2+2. I am talking about the damn scratch-off roll situation. Period. Don't respond back. Admit you are wrong. Admit you didn't realize what I was talking about, and move on. I won't respond back.
Done.
2+2 *sigh*
no you weren't. Or if you were you expressed yourself unclearly.
Also, why do you think the fact that you won't respond back is an argument against a retort. At the very least, you're guaranteeing me the last word... which on the interwebs means that you're guaranteeing me that i will win the argument.
Quote:
So, if you have that string of losers, and you are dealing with a FINITE roll of tickets, with a legally-mandated rate of winners, then you get a situation like Shawn Jacobs. Overall you have a low chance, but this is one of the few times that "it's due" really applies.
In the bolded part, you specifically and incorrectly try to apply the lottery ticket roll situation to SJ.
You were not just talking about the scratch offs. You were talking about how the scratch off situation is analogous to SJ. Unless theres some arcane sentence structure that youre using that makes this sentence mean the precise opposite of what it appears to mean, you are talking about SJ, not about just the scratch off rolls.
Last edited by Turyia; 11-21-2012 at 06:50 AM.