Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveC95818
The shrinking of the Venetian is probably a predictable result of these factors, but it's still pretty ugly to watch IRL.
It's too fatalistic to say the Venetian is a predictable result of circumstances.
What is predictable is that SOME rooms will close. What is not predictable is which rooms those will be.
Venetian was only behind Bellagio a few years ago. What changed? Well, poker is down, sure. But management also actively downsized the room, and that's out of control of the players.
What is not out of players' control is the locust swarming. Every time one room does something minor - raise rake, reduce comps - a lot of people whine and bitch and declare that room to be the worst room and move elsewhere. Of course, when their next destination makes the same moves, that becomes the new Worst Room Ever and the swarm moves on. In its wake, there's a trail of destruction as each room builds up infrastructure to accomodate the swarm. Everyone wants 50 rooms each with the softest 1/2 NL game known to mankind - this loses critical mass for the larger games and turns the LV poker scene into a substinence farming operation.
It would be nice if there were just abother poker boom. But more reasonable is for people to make sure the 1-2 best rooms (however you define that) are fully supported so they can weather the storm.