Quote:
Originally Posted by pedercina71
You seem to be missing the entire point over and over again for some reason.
Regarding your comment about naivity, people who have been scammed generally tend to feel naiv and easily fooled, this is what happens when someone fools you, you feel ashamed and stupid and taken advantage of. Thanks kindly for yet again pointing that out.
Regarding Jasons coaching, perhaps you havent read or seen the original post on 2p2 which has been removed or you havent read the thread on Stox, if not Id be happy to repost points which deal with Jasons poor coaching. Id love to hear your arguments against them.
Perhaps you havent spoken to some of the people involved in this mess and know that some of the complaints have already been proven false? Thge majority of the complaints still stand as-is, but the coaching complaints seem to have nothing to do with the real issue - a staking deal gone bad.
I've read it all.... I dont know Jason Ho, nor do I care to know him based on what I have been told so far but the only players whose opinions I trust
as players who had coaching experiences with Jason seem to have had fairly positive experiences - one of them is Sublime in this thread, he is a goofball in real life but he knows what he is talking about when it comes to poker. I've spent hours talking poker with Sublime, if he felt he got something out of Jason Ho's coaching then I believe him far more than I believe his stable of stakers who are upset that the staking deal went bad.
With that said I have never seen a video from Jason Ho other than the joke videos posted on YouTube, but then again I think most video coaches are pretty poor at what they do so take that with a grain of salt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFE888
i would say the coaching aspect is a major reason for the complaints brought by these group of poker players.
they claim jason ho has been masking as a high stakes poker player when he can't even beat 1/2. (results prove it) THUS, his coaching was a scam, as well as his PLO fund.
there is no way this is just a staking deal gone wrong.
Of course its more than just a staking deal gone wrong, but for the purposes of this thread and the hope of the stakers to recover their funds we should all be focusing on this narrow aspect because that is the fundamental core of this issue. Most of the people chiming in this thread are "mee toos", people who are outraged yet were never affected by Ho, many (like me) have never even seen a real coaching video of his. My goal is only to keep this thread on topic, and the heart of the issue is the bad staking deal - all the other components are subtopics that are relevant when it affects the staking deal but not relevant as evidence when its not associated with the staking deal.
For the record coaching sites usually hire their coaches because they are good teachers, not because they are winning high stakes players. A good example of that would be Ed Miller, former 2+2 author who is highly respected yet when he wrote his seminal work Small Stakes Hold'em he had barely played above the mid-limit stakes range, and when he wrote his first two NL books he was learning to play the game at the same time. Ed's ability to teach is fantastic, few people who have read his works could claim that his lack of experience made him unqualified to write these titles... thousands of players have read Ed's books and have gone on to be much bigger players than Ed ever has been, its a testament to his work, and is also the same reason why coaching sites chose their coaches for the most part.
Quote:
Originally Posted by teddyFBI
Strongly disagree. This thread (and the one that you moved to the mod forum, and have not moved back) is rife with examples of outright dishonesty, either premeditated or opportunistic. There are two components to the allegations though, and the issue of whether JH is as winning a player or as good of a coach as he claims is very much subordinate to the theft/dishonesty prong, but that hardly makes the coaching issue disappear. I know that Stox is an advertiser here, but their alleged negligence in bringing him on or retaining him as a coach (irrespective of whether it was a matter of poker abilities, or questions of character/honesty) does not deserve to be swept under the rug with your characterization of the matter as a 'staking deal gone bad'.
There is no doubt that the accusations show that Ho was "rife with examples of outright dishonesty, either premeditated or opportunistic", but the reason the original thread was moved to the mod forum was also because there were unsubstantiated claims from individuals who have accounts on this forum yet chose to use an anonymous account to hide their identity so they can stretch the truth. There has been dishonesty on both sides of this story, since I am privy to some details not yet shared in this forum you will have to take my word for it until these details are shared publicly by Jim and/or the accusers.
PS: Stox is also a competitor of 2+2's, they host forums just like 2+2 does and sell education like 2+2 does - the fact that they are an advertiser is irrelevant. Please do not accuse us of sweeping this story under the rug due to business relationships, you man not intend it to be but its insulting to me personally, my intentions here are pure - to help find a solution for those who claim they were scammed in a staking deal while keeping the topic on focus so a solution can be found.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gobby888
The original thread on 2p2 (which is probably locked somewhere) has statements from not just one student, but at least 5. These statements are available on the Stoxpoker forum, albeit in the private area (paying subscribers only) in a massive thread on Jason Ho.
You can see how easy it is if only one person comes forward with a story, how quickly they will get dismissed because it's a Stoxpoker coach. Even when so many come forward, 2p2 admin still dismisses it....
Please do not make false accusations - nobody is dismissing the claims of the people who where part of the PLO fund on Stoxpoker, if any of these five people wanted to post here under their real screen names rather than hide under a gimmick account we would welcome them with open arms. I think you also ignored the fact that Jim from Stoxpoker was told about this privately before the alleged scam was known about publicly and asked his forum members to come forward so a solution could be found, nobody came forward until after Jim asked them to do so.