Quote:
Given that many students overvalue stats as it is, and simply choose the coach with the best stats very quickly, that just reinforces the leak.
|
But at least they have a concrete criteria to help them choose. Without graphs, what remains? The feedback? pfft last time i looked a ton of feedback was from < 10 post members or people no-one's ever heard of who play busto limits even tho the coach also coaches up to say 200NL (let's say 25-200), so that feedback for me is just as big a leak if not bigger.
And, like you said in the HU discussion
Quote:
It's not important that he only plays fish, that's probably what most students that pay $100hr for coaching should do, play bad players.
It's not like anybody pays $100hr in heads up cash coaching to learn how to beat 400NL regs, right? That's a much higher priced service being offered by better players out there.
|
pretty much applies here too. You're not getting 50nl coaching to go sit at 100nl regfilled tables, so if that guy has a graph of him crushing some steaks that are higher than 50NL chances are he's got something to teach you and for it's gonna be worth the hourly.
And, I mean, what are you even saying? How will forcing everyone to post graphs make the leak worse? Bumhunters with awesome graphs ALREADY post their graphs, so it's not like that's gonna get worse. And in the current environment a potential student with this "graph leak" will shop around, see an absolute crusher who plays in tough games but has no graph posted (?!?!?!?!?!) then he'll see a bumhunter who posts his graph because it's pretty, of course the guy will choose the bumhunter over the crusher with no graph, so I'm not really sure how things could get worse by expecting every coach to have a graph in OP