Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1270
I won't comment on your "system" as I don't really know much about it.
In 8+ years sites have improved greatly. The top video makers these day are WAY better players than 8 years ago, which makes sense as we have all gotten better at this game. There are way more high quality "concept/theory" videos now. There are way more tools one can use to get better, and videos to teach you to uses these tools.
Our system is the only one that produces verifiable before and after results. To be fair, $20/month coaching sites don't run on the success of their students, they have no incentive to do so.
If we did always what our students wanted, jeez, we'd be nowhere. Aligning incentives does the trick.
And once you do that, you have to stop circle-jerking gto-phantasies. You actually have to do what works. Difference between University and the "real business world".
One you get paid for scking teachers d$ck, other you get paid for your real market value.
Ask any comparative cultural study student
I think the quality of videos hasn't even improved with the quality of the game. Sick enough that 8 years ago some sleeping pill, coke-snorting-weed-bag would get paid to record himself. So yeah, you don't see that today anymore and in a weird way we could convince ourselves that this is "progress".
You always put metrics in relation to something, otherwise they are meaningless.
Everybody will agree with that statement, and i don't think yours is "wrong" either, just interpreting the data differently.