This site is biased. The training sites sponsor their sites on here. Therefore, whomever pays the most is at the top. This is a confirmed fact. Just post questions in this forum.

You can never really go wrong with PXF. Additionally I suggest PokerSavvyPlus. Leggo is working on adding more MTT content, but the series my LuckyChewy is amazing.

Yeah, for MTTs Pokersavvy+ and Pokerxfactor are best

I dunno. I could be wrong, and I'm sure I'll get flamed for saying this, but I just checked out the $6 Turbo SnG "Free Sample" video by "inissint" on there. He may be a sick high stakes player (Sharkscope is wierd, looks like both sides of Mount Everest).

But he lost more than 1/2 his stack in the 1st 5 or so hands that he shouldn't have invested any money in imo.

If that video is the one they hand selected to represent their site, I'll pass.

That what's I thought.. just didn't wanted to accuse them of being biased.

actyper: by clicking on "Rankings" but I see what you are referring to.

I also definitely wouldn't recommend pokertrainingguide for any sort of impartial review of anything.

Sorry that is complete bs, don't go posting garbage if you don't have your facts straight.

Just curious why you would think that?

LOL. I worked in the industry for 2.5 years. I saw the payments sent to these sites.

It's ok though. I will still accept an apology .

They have a very clear and obvious conflict of interest in what they say about the sites. Given this, the question isn't really "can you prove they're not on the level?" (which is still pretty obvious), but instead "why should they be trusted to be?". I doubt you have a good answer for that.

lol he's working for CardRunners.. (at least he was since rencently dunno atm)

looks who's #1 in pretty much every Rankings.. (I don't say that they don't deserve it I am a member)

I think he knows his sh*t...

pretty sure he's right.

As noted TrevRobCR doesn't work in the training site industry anymore, though naturally his experience is useful here.

If you actually read their reviews they appear to be pretty dead on. Rankings could of course be based on someone's specific preference so that's subjective. Read some of the reviews & they appear to be pretty on from what I can see. You see both the pro's & cons of a site. Can someone site something specifically they see wrong with the review site?

I'm going to have to check out Leggo.